Approved

Any settlements in cryptocurrency by Russia automatically serve as confirmation of the use of fake cryptocurrency.
 Also, any conversion from Russian cryptocurrency to real currency is an assertion of economic fraud of the Russian Federation

Third World Countries as Financial Pits

Russian structures are trying to find cover in Western European circles to organize the inclination of the US to a policy of consent to Russia launching fake money. The African continent, as a continent in need of development, may become a space for the implementation of dangerous intentions of Russian structures, with the help of which the economy of Europe, the US and Great Britain (most likely Switzerland) will be destroyed.

Of course, the African continent needs development, but at what cost, when and under what circumstances - this is a question of collective work, which must be built in conditions of strict observance of international law and the principles of economic security.

 The means for restoring Africa could be US dollars, euros or pounds sterling, or all of them together. It could be a credit program or an investment program for 50 to 100 years with an obligation to use the dollar, euro, pound or all currencies as the main and common ones. Instead of de-dollarization, it could be the other way around and this would be an opportunity for the US to launch a new territory for using the US dollar. But for this, it is necessary to establish military control, political control for democracy and the full functioning of the state apparatus of each of the African countries that will be included in the list of those requiring financial support.

At the same time, Africans can do everything on their own if they could create conditions for development. Security, democracy and state apparatus. This is not there, so what kind of development can we talk about? They are crazy, Russian structures have gone crazy and their intentions do not include rationality, thoughtfulness and assessment of reality. It is really sad that this is the continent through software and structures can still influence influential people, but are far from understanding the economy.

Throughout the world, from time immemorial, at all times it has been, is and will be like this: first the conditions for using the funds, and then the use of the funds if the funds are found. Otherwise, why, except for humanitarian aid and financial tranches for primary necessity, that is, for the survival of people, do funds not flow to third world countries? Neither in the 20th century, nor in the 21st century has there been such a thing. Here is your explanation for the fact that, for their own purposes, the structures of Russia have lost their brains and are simply forcing the whole world to boil in the cauldron of this abyss of madness.

If the African continent wants to develop - first security, democracy and transparent work of state apparatuses, and only then the question of financing. In such conditions, I am sure that the doors to the USA, Europe and Great Britain will be open for African countries, which could find their interests in economic partnership with African countries that are ready for great development.

https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/526889-euroclear-predupredil-o-riskah-v-slucae-konfiskacii-rossijskih-aktivov

"Euroclear has warned of the consequences of confiscating frozen Russian assets. According to the CEO of Euroclear, this could lead to risks for the role of the euro as a reserve currency and the emergence of a non-European company that could compete with Euroclear". — Forbes reports.

This is a complete lie, since the amount of reserves is not comparable to the amount that could undermine the stable European currency euro. Europe has already spent more on the war in Ukraine than the amount of fake frozen funds of Russia.
 
By this, Euroclear wants to say the following: "if you take action against our lies, we will be forced to call it a threat, and if you arrest or conduct any operations with Euroclear assets, which we called Russian assets, then Euroclear will destroy the European economy together with the European Commission." - transcript. 

There is an unspoken belief that this is because I did not open a lawsuit against the colonizers during the previous two weeks. In that case, the personnel processes are even more irrelevant because the lawsuit will be open. 

Restrictions on political activity of aliensNothing in Articles 10, 11 and 14 shall be regarded as preventing the High Contracting Parties from imposing restrictions on the political activity of aliens.

— the result of the game of the traitors of Ukraine and their accomplices, which allegedly opens the possibility for Russia to undertake countermeasures. In fact, this is simply brazen recitation. There can be no countermeasures, since sanctions against Russia as a whole are countermeasures to Russia's aggression.

2. On July 7, 2024, it became known that more than half of American companies, including representatives of the ICT business, continue their activities in the Russian market after February 2022. This conclusion was made based on an analysis of open data conducted by specialists.

According to RIA Novosti, out of 659 US companies previously present in the Russian market, 337 organizations have maintained their presence in one form or another. Among them, 159 companies continue to operate without changes, and 178 have adapted their activities to the new conditions.
 

3. Among the companies continuing to operate in Russia are manufacturers of consumer goods such as Procter & Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive, Johnson & Johnson, PepsiCo, Mars and Coca-Cola. In the catering sector, Burger King, TGI Fridays and Papa John's have retained their presence.

4. In Russia, the number of hotel rooms managed by foreigners has decreased by a third since the beginning of 2022

In Russia, the number of hotel rooms managed by foreigners has decreased by a third since the beginning of 2022 and amounts to 30 thousand units by April 2024. Such data is provided by Olga Shirokova, partner of NF Group.

5. French home goods retailer Leroy Merlin topped the Forbes ranking of the largest foreign companies for 2022 with revenue of 529.7 billion rubles. The results of the study were published in early October 2023.

JT Groupe from Japan came in second place with revenue of 432.6 billion rubles. American Philip Morris International came in third with revenue of 399.9 billion rubles. The top five largest foreign companies also included PepsiCo with revenue of 303.7 billion rubles and Elo Groupe with revenue of 292.6 billion rubles.
 

6. It is possible that some companies or individuals own real estate in Russia. 

The business, profits and income of American and European companies may be seized and confiscated.

At the same time, it is important to emphasize that in connection with several components of political and economic life at once, the structures of Russia have that hopelessness that can be used to the benefit of Europe and Great Britain, if the format of “development” of British-European relations in itself does not become a threat to the security of Europe, Great Britain or the USA.

P.S. I do not fear the bitterness of the head of the European Commission, if my exposure of shadowy processes served as a support for it. According to the legislation of the European Union, I have no right to take part in political life outside of Ireland, but to defend my rights and the security of the entire planet is something to which I have a little more right than even many official representatives of the European Union as a whole.
There was a period when I showed my kindest attitude towards the head of the European Commission and, in principle, I had no questions for her as an individual politician, but the issue with Euroclear and so on is a question of our common future, which is so huge that any official against the backdrop of the Global Security of the Euro-Atlantic turns into mediocrity.
 Some politicians who have taken the path of dishonesty - too much underestimate what can be used against them and too much underestimate that what is happening to their lives is not the best that could happen. I wish rehabilitation to everyone and this is possible only through the implementation of clean, useful, conscientious steps.

AM

Despite the games of the colonizers of Ukraine and the supporters of Russian structures in the Euro-Atlantic region, as was stated, Ukraine will not pay off its obligations on loans provided through the Euroclear and the European Commission.

Ukraine

As of today, October 29, 2024, the Ukrainian state has not taken any action. Ukraine has shown itself as a party unwilling to counteract potential threats to BRICS, which after the creation of the final declaration of 2024 has turned into not only a dangerous environment for the economy, but also a dangerous environment for security, since aggressive Russia can count on the third point of the final declaration. Also, the Ukrainian side in no way supported international security in the issue related to ensuring information security, where an initiative was sent to Ukraine on the need to limit Russian information resources in the international environment. The issue of planning an economic blow was known to the Ukrainian side since 2023, which the BRICS summit 2024 confirmed. If global economic security did not oppose Russia's plans at the stage of their inception, there is no doubt that the issue of creating a new currency would have become the basis for the BRICS summit.
Based on this, unfortunately we understand that Ukraine is a country controlled by Russian structures, and everything that happens in Ukraine is a controlled situation, artificially created and organized, where radicalism is a means to ensure truthfulness, pumping out money and bloodshed. 

This could be used to dismantle the overall economic security policy. 

In 2018, Roman Abramovich was deceived by the FSB. He was robbed of 4 billion dollars, which were converted into cryptocurrency. They want to "cash out" 500 million, so they do it through colonized Ukraine.

I will never understand Abramovich in his policy of relations with Russia.

 As Ukrainian media report, Russia is trying to launch something similar with Turkey. This is a circumvention of sanctions, which contradicts international law, the UN Charter.

The mechanism is the same: fake cryptocurrency - conversion to ruble - cooperation with pro-Russian influence circles - business. In all likelihood, Russian structures are connecting Kazakhstan to implement these goals.

China received information about the influence of Russian structures in the Euro-Atlantic region, which probably upset the Chinese side in view of the fact that trusting relations with Russia may now be in doubt. 

06.11.2024 

https://www.dw.com/ru/es-mozet-razresit-euroclear-ispolzovat-aktivy-rossii/a-70653696

euroclear is not a political institution, but a private company, the regulation of which is accompanied by state structures of Belgium. The European Commission, represented by individual representatives, most likely represents the interests of Russia, since the policy associated with the so-called assets of Russia is too unconvincing in assessing its credibility. The company euroclear is not under European sanctions, which means that the regulation of euroclear policy belongs only to euroclear. The rest is a political show and politicization of pro-Russian interests through the European political space. This is a fact that destroys the concept of independence of the European Union, which means that taking the required measures is a matter of critical importance, a matter of European security by definition.

It is logical that before permission there should be an official ban. An official ban in the case of private companies can only be the result of legal proceedings. And Belgium, as a country entrusted with the functions of regulating the Euroclear, can be the only party that can form a ban on the use or management of the so-called "assets". The European Commission is a supra-governmental body of the European Union, but not a competent body, and in accordance with the legally provided order of regulation, which is important to emphasize once again, the regulation is carried out by Belgium. Thus, the messages about "permission", in the absence of decisions on the ban by the Belgian competent authorities - serves as evidence of the falsity of the assets of Russia by definition. 

31 October 2024  

In the absence of other methods or implementation of other instruments to ensure economic security, Global Economic Security will construct a legal framework and organizational mechanisms.

Kind Regards, 
AM (Oleksandr Mishcheriakov) 

"In an economy with incomplete markets and consumers who are sufficiently risk averse, we show that the government can uniquely implement a permanent primary deficit using nominal debt and continuous Markov strategies for primary deficits and payments to debtholders. But this result fails if there are also useless pieces of paper (bitcoin for short) that can be traded. If there is trade in bitcoin, then there is no continuous Markov strategy for the government that leads to unique implementation. Instead, there is a continuum of equilibria with distinct real allocations in which the price of bitcoin converges to zero. And there is a balanced budget trap: continuous government policies designed for a permanent primary deficit cannot eliminate an alternative steady state in which r - g = 0 and the government is forced to balance its budget. A legal prohibition against bitcoin can restore unique implementation of permanent primary deficits, and so can a tax on bitcoin at the rate -(r - g) > 0." 

 Global Economic Security refuses all offers from Russian structures. We do not sell the future.

1. Switzerland 

2. American companies that were in processing, but even as of today, many companies have been able to navigate and construct a more careful policy in the course of questionable changes or initiatives that can seriously change something during a period of chaos 

3. Ukraine 

4. Conversion in different types

After the Summit is over, we will be able to draw conclusions.

1. Euroclear publicly allocates 35 billion dollars to Ukraine through Europe, where a loan means the presence of a certain percentage. 

2. Euroclear privately allocates 35 billion dollars to Russia due to the fact that the interest rate for Ukraine is twice as high as possible, which means that Russia receives a financial tranche for free, for which Ukraine will pay. In the worst case, Russia will receive a financial tranche at an incredibly low interest rate. 

3. these funds will go to purchase weapons and missiles from Iran so that Russia can continue the so-called war.

Global Economic Security calls on the European Union to get out of this game and strongly recommends saving Europe from political collapse or financial crisis due to the plans of Russian structures.

DANGER

• Bank mergers
• Wero
• Visa-Hong Kong dollar or the return of Visa to Russia
• Euroclear 
•  Tensions between Europe and China worsen

....and all this is happening not in Moscow, but in Brussels, America and Europe as a whole and this is happening when BRICS is engaged in de-dollarization, and Russian structures are going crazy because they will no longer understand how to implement a fake cryptocurrency.

Global Economic Security 

This also proves the deliberate disregard as a deliberateness, and not political inattention, in the statement of July 11, 2023.

Ukrainian ruling circles, being pro-Russian colonialists, conducted communications with the West, the USA, Great Britain and Europe from 2022 to 2024. From now on, all their contacts are subject to the right to re-checking to identify accomplices in the pro-Russian game against peace on the part of politicians from Switzerland, France, Germany, Belgium, Great Britain and the USA. State resources and finances, stabilization of radicalism in Ukraine ("war"), development of international chaos, oppression of human rights, encouragement of espionage, betrayal - this is the subject of interest of intelligence communities, law enforcement agencies and Interpol.

This evidence serves as a necessity for taking due measures, that is why a trial will be opened against the Ukrainian colonialists. The development of the trial will begin on Monday, June 7.

In this regard, the main political processes in the world may be taken differently and the first particularly important issue will be the elections in the USA.

According to Ukrainian law, the answer should have been received within seven days, where the deadline was Thursday-Friday (3,4 October 2024). Instead, we saw other processes that are the responsibility of the Ukrainian colonizers, even despite the involvement of individual components of the Euro-Atlantic economy by Russian structures. Therefore, everything important that happened in the period from the first to the fourth of October is a derivative of Russian structures by definition.

This evidence serves as a necessity for taking due measures, that is why a trial will be opened against the Ukrainian colonialists. The development of the trial will begin on Monday, June 7.

United Nations Charter, Chapter VII:
Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression

In connection with the obvious intentions of Russian structures to undermine the international economy, the open form of the threat to the United States in the form of de-dollarization, aggression against Ukraine, unfair exploitation of the Euroclear company, the obvious intentions to use BRICS against the world economy and even against the security foundations of the BRICS member countries in the long-term assessments of their economic and industrial sustainability, in connection with Russia's attempts to inflict any crushing blow on the Euro-Atlantic region (economy, disruptions in the supply of natural resources, political instability, an increase in social chaos through information processing), etc. - the Russian Federation must be excluded from the list of permanent members of the UN Security Council until Russia is restored to legal life, which is possible only after the launch of international law and the coordination of international efforts to carry out appropriate legal regulation in relation to forces and individuals who deliberately destroy the foundations of international life, organize and try to organize wars and are interested in all of the above.

Chapter 7 of the UN Charter provides for the legality of an exception that can be implemented under the terms of a prescribed agreement between a majority of the permanent members of the Security Council: the United States, Great Britain and France.

Thus, guided by Article 41, the international environment, in particular the BRICS platform, will not be able to conduct economic relations with the Russian Federation.

This legal mechanism ensures stability for the global economy, the economies of Europe and the USA, Great Britain and the Commonwealth countries, and only China, with whom the Russian special services are playing a dangerous game and displaying the highest form of political hypocrisy, reaching the point of readiness, if necessary, to strike at China in the name of saving the structural interests of the Russian special services.

From September 26, 2024, the governments of France, Great Britain and the United States are responsible for the international situation, where the responsibility of the government does not mean the responsibility of their countries and peoples. In case of failure to take such measures, which are acute in their necessity in the name of saving the economy, law and international order - the governments of the above-mentioned countries create all the conditions for them to be called enemies of their peoples and active representatives of the special services of Russia.

A temporary seat on the permanent UN Security Council may be occupied by a European country, such as Germany, a Muslim country, such as Qatar or Turkey, or an Asian country, such as Japan. The permanent members of the UN must propose a list of countries and open a vote to the UN General Assembly.

The UN, as a powerful organization, has also been repeatedly targeted by Russian structures and is also used through the structural capabilities of the special services of the Russian Federation. At the same time, Russia has repeatedly demonstrated its determination to destroy the UN as an international central institution regulating international relations and law

This mention is important in case Russia tries to destroy the UN structures in the context of the emerging changes against aggression and acts of violation of peace.

Addition

From 12:58 GMT+1 26 September 2024

1. A statement will be sent to the Ukrainian state, the political leadership, the Ukrainian opposition and the security sector of Ukraine, which will stipulate the need to call on the United States, Great Britain and France to organize the exclusion of the Russian Federation from the permanent members of the UN Security Council until the moment of Russia’s restoration to legal life.

2. In case of failure of Ukraine to implement these measures, this automatically proves the complicity of the ruling and political circles of Ukraine in the interests aimed at undermining the world economy. In such a case, the concept of the destruction of the economy by Russia will acquire even greater legal proof, practically irrefutable.

3. If Ukraine implements these measures, this does not exclude the fact of Ukraine's inaction in 2023, from which various unfair tendencies in the economic sector are already emanating and being born by Russian structures, while this step will be important in view of the destruction of the stable closeness between Russian structures and Ukraine's strategic non-public policy.

4. Following Ukraine's open appeal, where openness is a way of providing evidence of the existence of a call for the need to exclude Russia from the permanent members of the Security Council, sent by the Ukrainian side to the United States, Great Britain and France, responsibility will naturally fall on the governments of the United States, Great Britain and France.

5. In the event of the implementation of the legal measures prescribed above and corresponding to international law, the UN Charter by the French, American and British parties, the issue of ensuring international economic security in a legal manner can be considered closed in the context of understanding that the USA, France and Great Britain are the majority within the UN Security Council. 

Global Economic Security 

Official statement for the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine (11.07.2023):

EU Banks Launch Wero Payments to Dislodge Visa, Mastercard

As Bloomberg reports, Europe is preparing to launch a new payment system. I am convinced that today, during Russia's aggression not only against Ukraine, but the entire world, including the European Union, abrupt transformations can be dangerous, especially when Russia is aiming to strike at the Euro-Atlantic economy. And the most important thing is that there are no sound reasons for rare changes, although from the point of view of at least moral law, Europe has the opportunity to create an alternative to Visa and MasterCard.

First of all, I would like to bring you all back to more balanced assessments: "killer"? BNP PARIBAS and DEUTSCH BANK are large banks, but they are banks, not the banking industry. There are thousands, thousands and thousands of banks in the world with an existing customer base that MasterCard and Visa use. If we are talking about competition, then this will oblige MasterCard and Visa to provide higher quality, safer or more interesting services to customers. Therefore, despite respect for the Bloomberg publication, especially knowing the existing connection between Bloomberg itself and the US government, and also not excluding the understanding that we are talking about banks with three AAA, which means a high level of trust from the point of view of the economic definition of trust as such - the assessments are too exaggerated.

Visa services are used by 3.4 billion people, and MasterCard by 2.4 billion people. The client base of banks wishing to create an alternative is no more than 5 percent at the start of the launch, where the start means a new product, in the conditions of already existing cards.

If Visa and MasterCard organize cryptocurrency identification, where the initiative has already been sent to Visa, there can be no alternatives. And if the launch of a new payment system will also include cryptocurrency identification, there is no point in launching it, since you can be sure that everything that is infected is the activity of Russian structures.

And vice versa, if existing payment systems do not contribute to economic security, then in such conditions, new payment systems offering security may even turn out to be the only option.

About Ukraine 

any victorious new plan guarantees populism in previous plans, the implementation of which depended exclusively on the Ukrainian side. populism in this case means inaction, and inaction is promoting the interests of Russian structures. the special services of the Russian Federation no longer surprise anyone with their erroneous systemic capabilities.

2022 plans

2023 plans 

2024 plans

I handed over information, documents, and evidence to the US Mission to the UN and the British Mission to the UN in Geneva as well.

Not an economic issue, but one that has a profound impact on the economy both during the so-called war in Ukraine and on the economic future, given the current plans of the structures of the Russian Federation.

The instigators of undermining international security, because of my official appeal to Ukraine, are planning or already "backing out", since the issue is about excluding Russia from the UN Security Council.

In a nod, Global Economic Security is called a fake by them, Russian structures and Ukrainian colonizers, despite the fact that there is no intelligence information here, but only decisions and activities aimed at preserving international economic security.

No matter how the structures of Russia imagine the abandonment of their plans, even if they try to condemn Global Economic Security, this is our common victory, the USA, Great Britain and Europe.

My sincere congratulations, but this victory does not eliminate the need to create insurance mechanisms and those instruments with the help of which economic security as a whole will be strengthened.

In case, realizing the danger of the accusation Global Economic Security, Russian structures will accuse the media - please note that most of the news is of Russian origin. That is why, right now (22:38 GMT+1) I am making a new official statement, which will also be published.

I will propose that Ukraine take the initiative to exclude all accounts, news outlets and any other media from the Internet by mass blocking. If Ukraine refuses this measure, I will once again confirm the reality of the intentions of Russian structures in the matter of undermining the world economy.

For everyone else, I present my other project, which I am transferring to the ownership of the Republic of Ireland: www.informationinsurance.ie

Once this project is nationalised, I am confident that Ireland will provide the opportunity for other countries to use this instrument.
 Also, this does not exclude the right to use this project outside of Ireland until the conditions under which the governments of different countries also implement this principle. Until that moment, the project is exclusively Irish.

STATEMENT 

Supplement from 09/27/2024

https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/naybilshi-banki-es-zapuskayut-alternativu-1727427575.html

 https://topcor.ru/51923-narodnyj-bank-kitaja-nanes-po-jekonomike-ssha-moschnyj-udar.html

Another piece of nonsense or another proof. It's a pity that the source name includes two letters AM in its name "alamy":

https://watcher.guru/news/brics-nearly-50-countries-look-to-its-blockchain-system-over-us-dollar 

For professional circles from the world of economics, special services and politics, it is absolutely clear and obvious that, unfortunately, the Russian structures have an open opportunity to strategically use Western instruments. The extremely stupid story with the company "Euroclear" is proof of this.

Visa's plans and intentions as of the 10th of September were globally different from those announced on September 25, 2024. The new plans of this company include interaction with the Hong Kong dollar, a specific Ethereum platform and tokenization.

Tokenization, unlike the identification of cryptocurrency in general, is a tool, but not a principle for ensuring global economic security.

Identification of cryptocurrency should be global, regardless of the type of cryptocurrency and platform. The control system should belong to all central banks of the Euro-Atlantic region and be also accessible to all corporations that do not want to deal with dangerous funds.

If the interests of Russian structures are behind such intentions of the Visa company, I confidently report a small but common victory. Russian structures are put in a hopeless position, where they are forced to look for new ways to implement their plans.

Therefore, in order to check whether the company Visa has bona fide plans or whether Visa is still used by Russian structures, today, 25.09.2024, the company Visa will make an open appeal on behalf of Global Economic Security.

As you have already read, Russian structures tried to create a crisis for the US by means of China, and to present each failure to the US as an attempt to create a crisis for China. Against the background of those recommendations where Global Economic Security offers the US and China USACH (see below) — Russian structures became worried that in the event of rapprochement between China and the US, Russia will have even more problems. Therefore, Russian structures may try to find their place in interstate economic relations between the US and China, which may be the connection of Visa with the Hong Kong dollar, the name of which does not explain that the Hong Kong dollar is closely connected with America. The proximity is only in the policy of the course.

Unlike the already existing gold, which became the basis for the formation of gold and foreign exchange reserves, other types of natural resources, in particular oil products, coal or other precious/semi-precious metals, are highly diverse natural resources, the pricing of which is variable, which means that the model for the formation of the value of money will be based on and dependent on too many types of reserves, which will increase the instability of pricing in proportion to the number of types of natural resources.

For example, in the case of oil products, environmental protection trends will create instability in the value of the new currency due to the missing oil reserve, in the case of rare earth metals, the program to counter weapons of mass destruction can also eliminate the stability of such reserves, coal can also be considered an unstable reserve provider, and gold and its pricing are more tied to the international economy than others due to gold and foreign exchange reserves.

Internal barter, as an even more insane concept for creating a reserve consisting of one type of natural resources, is insane in that barter requires an assessment of the value of natural resources, which is tied to the international economy, where the provision of the value of natural resources includes international practice of interaction and use of currently existing principles in international settlements. That is, from the current realities, ensuring pricing is doubtfully possible, since the formation of value will be tied to the current reality.

For the US, UK and the European Union it is sufficient to establish such a principle as: 

"a ban on the right to use the US dollar, the British pound sterling and the European euro in the formation of security for the pricing of reserves of new currencies" so that the process of forming an assessment of the value of natural resources would be impossible".

Regardless of the principles of interstate settlements between the BRICS member countries, pricing is the initial value of the international economy, which includes such values as consumer markets and the use of the US dollar, euro and British pound sterling, and therefore, recalculation of cost is not possible in reality. In this case, BRICS will really need to refuse to supply natural resources outside the BRICS member countries and organize not only de-dollarization, but also similar principles with the euro and British pound.

As you already know, there are already countermeasures in place regarding both de-dollarization and analogues, as well as in the issue related to the so-called "isolation of the West from natural resources."

Before the Federal Reserve System was created, the British pound sterling was used as an international currency. And if the Kingdom of Great Britain had used this principle, then the estimated value of gold would hardly have been possible. At the same time, it is important to note that the Kingdom of Great Britain took part in the formation of the gold and foreign exchange reserve, which excludes the right of Russian structures to create interstate tension between the USA and Great Britain.

The only possibility for Russia to create a new currency is to create a new country, which would include all BRICS countries and their New partners. But this is also not possible due to the sanction of non-recognition of the legal personality of any state or union entity, which the Russian Federation will be a part of. In case this would go against international law, a countermeasure could be the creation of a political and economic union EBAL (Europe, Britain, America, Latino), which would ensure the formation of a bipolar world order with no connection between the official union EBAL and the unofficial union ordered by Russia. China has long been informed about the consequences of the reality of a bipolar order, even before the creation of "Global Economic Security" as a project.

 In the absence of real pricing of reserves, this means that there can only be artificial pricing that claims the use of empty cryptocurrency under the guise of natural resources.

From the point of view of the Russian structures, the BRICS countries, being countries that have at their disposal a great deal of certain types of natural resources, are an instrument for striking at the Euro-Atlantic and other countries.

But this is a highly unprofessional point of view, from which destructive plans are based, the implementation of which, given the presence of highly qualified specialists in the BRICS member countries, is hardly possible.

Russian structures plan to isolate the Euro-Atlantic region and cut off supplies of certain types of natural resources. Russia's political and structural motives exclude the following:

The Euro-Atlantic is organized as follows: the USA, Europe and Great Britain are united by NATO. The Kingdom of Great Britain belongs to the Commonwealth of Nations, among which is one of the BRICS member countries, India. India, as a country that owns natural resources, has the right to interact with the countries of the Commonwealth, which means that Great Britain, Canada and Europe will still be able to interact with India.

Considering the presence of the military-political alliance NATO, as well as the obligations imposed on the member countries of the alliance, the United States also has the right to be guided by NATO principles, which ensures the stable work of the United States.

What Russian structures see as isolation is, in fact, the destruction of the sectoral economy of the BRICS member countries, since the volumes of consumption of one or another natural resource by the Euro-Atlantic region are involuntarily reflected in their pricing. Refusal of partnership and supplies will lead to a reduction in the price of natural resources, the percentage of which can be disastrous for the sectoral economy. In order to save the sectoral economy, the BRICS member countries will be forced to organize sectoral economic rehabilitation, which will require financing. Financing means the reorganization of the state economy, which will provide for the use of funds for sectoral support. The process of saving the sectoral economy is a process of spending funds that can only drag out time, but not ensure sectoral stabilization, which means that the economy will become a "cash cow, from whose milk nothing will come of it."

If the awareness of such a problem leads to attempts to use India for supplies, which is crazy by definition, since then there is no point in the whole idea, the Euro-Atlantic will be able to respond with a constructive counter-measure:

Letter to US, UK, EU governments 

Important message to traders

1. Unfortunately, the Western branch of the Russian structures were able to find an opportunity to use Euroclear, based on which Euroclear is represented by the holder of Russian assets. Euroclear is a company that provides various services and previously had a very stable reputation due to its proximity to J.P. Morgan. But Euroclear is not the central bank of Europe and, moreover, the activities of Euroclear as a company are supervised by the National Bank of Belgium.

In order to eliminate unfounded statements - without excesses in thinking, the concept of lies will be destroyed in the operation of economic terms as follows:

Do countries such as Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Great Britain, Hungary, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Finland, France, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Sweden and Estonia hold assets commensurate with the amount of Russia's assets in this company?

Euroclear may provide services, but Euroclear is not a holder of state assets even in European countries, let alone Russia. Holders of state resources are central banks of European countries, the European Central Bank or other, non-private structures.

2. Euroclear reportedly operates with Russian assets amounting to three hundred billion dollars, from which Euroclear can make a profit of $35 billion. Why does the world not know about Russia itself using its own assets through Euroclear to generate profits even before the war?

In the extreme case, we are talking about a period of 2 years, where the Euroclear can make more than 5 percent per annum from the amount of 300 billion dollars and this does not take into account the percentage of profit of the Euroclear itself. But the extreme case is a lie, because the so-called frozen assets as a tool for use to generate profits became a subject for discussion only in 2024, and the freezing occurred only in March 2022. To form the process for use, many processes had to take place, including the consent of political Europe to use the so-called assets of Russia. Discussions began only in 2023-2024, therefore the period of organization of the Euroclear amount of 35 billion dollars is 6-12 months, which means 10-20% per annum from the amount of 300 billion dollars.

If this were to be a reality, Euroclear services would become the only alternative. State resources of many countries, insurance reserves could be used, thus a percentage of these funds would ensure the formation of the European budget, which in 2023 amounted to about 200 billion dollars.

A separate issue is the report that Russia allegedly tried to use China, with the help of which 80 billion dollars were transferred to the management of the Euroclear. Regardless of whether this is true or not, this is in any case intelligence data that needs more solid evidence. But any actions against China are the basis for the rapprochement of Russia and China in the subsequent intentions of the special services of the Russian Federation.

If the Euroclear had been able to show restraint and foresight, the Euroclear would have been able to report that the actions of Russian structures were deliberate and destructive. These are grounds for the Euroclear to make financial claims against Russia in order to preserve economic security.

Sanctions 2014

• 1. On April 1, 2014, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization suspended all forms of cooperation with Russia, except for negotiations at ambassadorial level and above.
• 2. On March 12, 2014, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, by decision of its governing council, suspended the process of admitting Russia into its membership and announced the strengthening of cooperation with Ukraine.
• 3. On July 30, sanctions were imposed against 8 people, as well as against the Russian National Commercial Bank, the Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern, and the Dobrolet airline. It also imposed sanctions in the areas of trade and investment against Crimea and Sevastopol:
• A ban has been imposed on investments in the infrastructure, transport, telecommunications, and energy sectors, as well as the extraction of oil, gas, and minerals. The supply of equipment for these sectors, as well as the provision of financial and insurance services for them, is prohibited.
• A ban has been imposed on the purchase of more than 250 types of goods, including minerals and hydrocarbons.
• European financial institutions are prohibited from issuing loans or acquiring shares in projects affected by sectoral sanctions.
• 4. On July 31, sanctions were imposed against Sberbank of Russia, VTB Bank, Gazprombank, Vnesheconombank, and Rosselkhozbank.
• 5. On September 12, he introduced a number of sanctions:
• Banned the organization of debt financing for three Russian fuel and energy companies: Rosneft, Transneft, and Gazprom Neft. Trading in bonds of these companies with a maturity of over 30 days and participation in organizing the issuance of such securities are prohibited.
• Tightened restrictions on the provision of loans and investment services for five Russian banks: Sberbank of Russia, VTB, Gazprombank, Vnesheconombank, and Rosselkhozbank. Issuing loans to them with a maturity of over 30 days, and acquiring and trading their new bonds, shares, and similar financial instruments with a maturity of over 30 days are prohibited.
• Banned the organization of debt financing for three of Russia's largest defense concerns: Uralvagonzavod, Oboronprom, and the United Aircraft Corporation.
•  Included nine Russian defense concerns in the sanctions list: Sirius Concern, Stankoinstrument, Khimkompozit, Kalashnikov Concern, Tula Arms Plant, Engineering Technologies, High-Precision Systems NPO, Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern, and Bazalt NPO.
• Included 24 people in the sanctions list.
• 6.  On 2 June, the EU restricted free access to the European Parliament for the Russian ambassador and another Russian diplomat, suspended the assessment of requests from members of the State Duma and the Federation Council on an individual basis, and suspended parliamentary cooperation within the Russia-EU Committee.

• 7. On March 15, he recommended that European banks refrain from purchasing Russian government bonds.
• 8. On 29 April 2021, the European Parliament adopted a non-binding resolution calling for Russia to be cut off from the SWIFT system and for an oil and gas embargo to be imposed if “the build-up of Russian troops on the border with Ukraine escalates into an invasion of Ukraine by Russia.”
• In 2014, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development froze decisions on new projects in Russia.
• 9. In 2014, due to the situation in Ukraine, the Nordic Council postponed the spring round table with Russian parliamentarians, which was to be held in Stockholm.

 3. The securities that are called assets of Russia are not government bonds, therefore securities must be backed by something, they cannot be valuable just like that. What kind of securities can there be if the main financial institutions of Russia, state companies of Russia, as well as Russia itself have been under sanctions since 2014? The combination of these factors explains that this is a lie.

The representative offices and offices of Euroclear are located in the countries whose expenses on the needs of refugees exceed 56 billion dollars. Considering that the central bank of Belgium supervises the activities of Euroclear, Europe had the opportunity to provide financing for the needs of refugees from the so-called "assets" of Russia. Instead, Europe spends European money, which probably relates to the taxpayers of the European Union. And instead of covering the needs of Europe, European politicians propose sending money to Ukraine, or rather, solving this issue with the colonizers of the Ukrainian state. Europe knows that the war in Ukraine is artificial, Europe received important evidence and documentary evidence, but nevertheless, the scale of influence of Russian special services today is enormous, which is why Russian structures force European politicians to play their dirty game. European politicians need protection, not condemnation. Considering that Global Economic Security is a project about the economy, the reasons for the need to provide protection should be kept silent, but this will be discussed in another project, which will be ready by October 2024.
technology  

Сonclusion

The volume of blocked assets is growing, in particular, as coupons are paid on bonds and dividends on shares stored in Euroclear.

Question: why does Ukraine agree to a loan, Europe gives a loan, when Europe determines its own expenses outside the principles of lending? That is, Europe's expenses are free, and Russia's so-called assets are paid? There is nothing more to say.

The influential EU commissioner in charge of the internal market, Thierry Breton, has resigned:

Letter to Thierry Breton:

Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States

Article 24

"All States have the duty to conduct their mutual economic relations in such a way as to take into account the interests of other countries. In particular, all States must avoid causing harm to the interests of developing countries."

Article 26

"All States have the duty to coexist in conditions of tolerance towards one another and to live in peace, irrespective of differences in political, economic, social and cultural systems, and shall promote trade between States with different economic and social systems. International trade shall be carried out without prejudice to generalized, non-discriminatory and non-reciprocal preferences in favor of developing countries, on the basis of mutual benefit, equitable advantages and the reciprocal granting of most-favoured-nation treatment".

Article 31

"All States have the duty to promote the balanced development of the world economy, taking due account of the fact that the well-being of the developed countries and the growth and development of the developing countries are closely interrelated and that the prosperity of the international community as a whole depends on the prosperity of its component parts".

Article 32

"No State may apply to another State or encourage the application of economic, political or any other measures of a coercive nature aimed at infringing its sovereign rights or at deriving any advantage therefrom".

The Charter of Economic Rights is a part of international law that is based on the definition of principles and rules of international politics (UN Charter) and only after the international economy.

That is, the system of significance of international law looks like this:

international law in general - UN Charter - economic law - charter of economic rights.

As you can see, the principles provided by the charter occupy the fourth place in the system of significance of the meanings of international law. But nevertheless, the charter of economic rights deserves attention.

I am practically convinced that the structures of Russia are trying to interpret the first part of the charter in their own way, promoting the concept of creating new economic instruments and alternatives, but then, starting with the tenth article, we are talking about more stable visions of international economic security, where ultimately, in the final part, in Articles 31 and 32, the final principles are spelled out that destroy the intentions of Russia and the short-sighted partners of the Russian Federation with regard to oppressing the economic interests of the United States:

1. De-dollarization is an open form of crude containment of the United States in the international economy.

2. In relation to SWIFT, there has not been a single practical claim from more than 190 countries and thousands of corporations in the entire history of SWIFT. Therefore, the search for and creation of an alternative to SWIFT is a politicized issue, which is confirmed by the absence of official claims to SWIFT in the system serving as a financial international instrument. Politicization - provides the right for the United States to appeal to international political law (which ranks second in the system of significance of legal meanings of international law), and therefore has the right to respond counter and politically.

The political reaction of the USA can be a sanction to block countries attacking the USA and the right of these countries to work with the USA can be limited or regulated by the American government in accordance with the US Constitution. This means that more than two trillion US dollars of America's external debt - cease to be American debt. Hence the question: How much time will it take for the anti-dollar union in anti-dollar conditions for each of the countries, as in this case the USA, to feel the savings of two trillion dollars? The answer to this question gives the USA the right to recall Article 32 of the Charter of Economic Rights, but even more, this answer gives the USA the right to determine the anti-Western alternatives that are created by Russia and their allies - economically inexpedient steps, and therefore exclusively politically motivated. Such an official conclusion of the USA ensures the right for the USA and partners to save peoples whose governments give preference not to economic development and international law, working in the conditions of the principles of international peace and friendship, but to the politicization of the economy, which is economically inexpedient.

And in this case, saving peoples may mean not the right to asylum (in the case of wishes to move citizens to other countries), but the right to provide them with protection on the territory of their states, which, as you understand, ensures the legitimacy of the United States to support the will of peoples who want to change their governments.

Without excluding the above-mentioned rights of the United States, and as another additional instrument that ensures not only the above-mentioned legitimacy for the United States of America, but also a broader opportunity for the Euro-Atlantic economy to demonstrate its resilience and organize countermeasures against dishonest plans:

Letter to FED, CBE, CBA

This means that China, under this sanction, will not have the tools to ensure that the US government debt can be paid.

This is a critical mistake of the Russian structures, because as a support, the People's Republic of China is all that Russia can count on. But, the Russian Federation has put China in a really difficult position, where the future of the Chinese economy depends on one political decision by the United States.

Realizing their own hopelessness, contrary to common sense, after the attempt to destroy the US economy, Russian structures tried to present their mistake as deliberate actions that allegedly correspond to the interests of the US and this is so that through the US, Russian structures could continue to stay afloat. But this is also a critical mistake, since the People's Republic of China can approve violations of the sanctions policy against Russia by the US itself and approve complicity in the interests of Russian structures by individual American representatives if the US or American companies or banks are noticed in the creation of a hollow cryptocurrency, which can be the subject of legal proceedings on the undermining of the world economy by Russian structures and their colleagues from the American workshop.

This is precisely why global changes in the operation of the international economy (for example, what Russia is planning through BRICS) are unsafe for everyone, just as the question of the US national debt is inappropriate at a time when world politics is oversaturated with instability and hopelessness of the leading structural forces of the planet, the special services of Russia.
If China plays the games of Russian structures, then the US will have legal grounds to close the national debt without financial waste. If the US plays the same games, then China will be able to first blame Russia, and then the US, which will ultimately be very expensive.

Russia's biggest mistake is that they have begun to actualize issues related to the national debt of other countries. Because if the countries to which there are debt obligations begin to engage in a policy of covering national debts, then there will be no place for Russia. And this means that the national debt to Ukraine and Europe, which is at least 700 billion dollars, Russia will have to pay in conditions where it will be impossible to compete in the economy, therefore, all that Russia will be able to use is the domestic market and natural resources.

For example:

Population growth, development of needs, construction, jobs, developing consumer market, development of education and globalization of many industries due to the integral Internet space - open up either new difficulties or new prospects. Everything depends on how exactly the further principles of international economic relations will be organized.

The real economy requires work, but is not a soap bubble, as is the case with dubious schemes, for example, when creating a hollow cryptocurrency, which is what Russian structures are aiming for.

 Organisation